🔗 Share this article

January 30th, 1972 remains one of the most deadly – and significant – days during multiple decades of unrest in the region.

In the streets where it happened – the legacy of the tragic events are visible on the walls and seared in public consciousness.

A public gathering was organized on a wintry, sunny day in the city.

The protest was challenging the policy of detention without trial – holding suspects without trial – which had been implemented following three years of violence.

Soldiers from the specialized division shot dead thirteen individuals in the neighborhood – which was, and still is, a overwhelmingly republican area.

One image became particularly memorable.

Images showed a religious figure, the priest, displaying a bloodied white handkerchief while attempting to defend a group carrying a youth, the injured teenager, who had been killed.

News camera operators captured extensive video on the day.

Documented accounts includes Father Daly informing a reporter that troops "gave the impression they would shoot indiscriminately" and he was "totally convinced" that there was no provocation for the gunfire.

The narrative of the incident was disputed by the original examination.

The initial inquiry concluded the soldiers had been shot at first.

In the peace process, the ruling party commissioned a new investigation, following pressure by family members, who said the first investigation had been a whitewash.

During 2010, the findings by Lord Saville said that on balance, the paratroopers had fired first and that zero among the victims had been armed.

At that time head of state, David Cameron, apologised in the government chamber – saying killings were "improper and unjustifiable."

The police commenced examine the incident.

One former paratrooper, known as the defendant, was brought to trial for killing.

Indictments were filed over the fatalities of the first individual, 22, and in his mid-twenties William McKinney.

The defendant was further implicated of attempting to murder Patrick O'Donnell, additional persons, Joe Mahon, Michael Quinn, and an unnamed civilian.

Remains a judicial decision preserving the defendant's privacy, which his attorneys have claimed is required because he is at threat.

He told the Saville Inquiry that he had exclusively discharged his weapon at individuals who were possessing firearms.

This assertion was rejected in the official findings.

Evidence from the investigation was unable to be used immediately as evidence in the criminal process.

During the trial, the accused was shielded from sight with a privacy screen.

He addressed the court for the initial occasion in the hearing at a hearing in that month, to answer "not responsible" when the allegations were presented.

Relatives of the victims on Bloody Sunday journeyed from Londonderry to the judicial building every day of the trial.

A family member, whose relative was died, said they always knew that hearing the trial would be emotional.

"I remember the events in my recollection," he said, as we examined the main locations mentioned in the proceedings – from Rossville Street, where his brother was killed, to the adjacent the courtyard, where one victim and another victim were killed.

"It returns me to my location that day.

"I participated in moving the victim and place him in the medical transport.

"I went through the entire event during the testimony.

"Despite experiencing all that – it's still worthwhile for me."